The story began in 1893, with a Kentucky schoolteacher and her older sister. 23, 2:18 p.m.: An earlier version of this article said “Happy Birthday” is a six-note song. The song has seen the rise and fall of vinyl records, cassette tapes, CDs and now, the era of digital streaming music. The complex saga of the eight-note ditty has spanned more than 120 years, withstanding two world wars and several eras of copyright law. The song brings in about $2 million a year in royalties for Warner, according to some estimates. James said the scene was “essential” to the film and ultimately decided to pay up.Īt a March hearing in the case, records show, a Warner/Chappell representative seated in the audience told the judge that the company collects as much as “six figures” for certain single uses of the song. And we only used it for 9 seconds,” James wrote in an email passed along by his publicist. “It was quite expensive for us at that time and with our budget. Filmmaker Steve James paid Warner $5,000 to use the song in his 1994 documentary “Hoop Dreams.” Two of the filmmaker plaintiffs paid $1,500 and $3,000 for the rights to use the song, their attorneys said. The fact that the birthday tune can’t be played or sung without permission from Warner has been little more than a surprising piece of trivia for most, but for Warner Music Group, it has meant big business.
#Happy birthday song with name inserted free
But even those who wanted to sing the song publicly as part of a business, say a restaurant owner giving out free birthday cake to patrons, technically had to pay to use the song, prompting creative renditions at chain eateries trying to avoid paying royalties. Royalties were most often collected from stage productions, television shows, movies or greeting cards. Until now, Warner has asked for royalties from anyone who wanted to sing or play “Happy Birthday to You” - with the lyrics - as part of a profit-making enterprise. Goliath battle that pitted independent filmmakers against a large corporation collecting profits on a song whose authors had long since died. The plaintiffs’ attorneys had characterized the years-long legal fight as a David vs. It’s unbelievable.”Ī spokesman for Warner/Chappell, the publishing arm of Warner Music, said, “We are looking at the court’s lengthy opinion and considering our options.” Duplication for commercial use must be authorized in writing by ADAM Health Solutions.“‘Happy Birthday’ is finally free after 80 years,” said Randall Newman, an attorney for the plaintiffs in the suit, which included a group of filmmakers who are producing a documentary about the song. Links to other sites are provided for information only - they do not constitute endorsements of those other sites. A licensed physician should be consulted for diagnosis and treatment of any and all medical conditions. The information provided herein should not be used during any medical emergency or for the diagnosis or treatment of any medical condition. This site complies with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information: verify here. Learn more about A.D.A.M.'s editorial policy editorial process and privacy policy.
is among the first to achieve this important distinction for online health information and services. follows rigorous standards of quality and accountability. is accredited by URAC, for Health Content Provider (URAC's accreditation program is an independent audit to verify that A.D.A.M.
0 kommentar(er)
